If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Affirmative Action is Higher Education. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Affirmative Action is Higher Education paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Affirmative Action is Higher Education, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Affirmative Action is Higher Education paper at affordable prices
Diversity Versus Excellence There is a growing movement in all walks of life across America to promote diversity. This movement is active in college admissions, the work force, military admittance, and many other walks of life. Throughout the country universities have been reserving admission spots and using quotas for diverse students as part of affirmative action. Less qualified foreign and minority students should always be required to compete directly with equally or higher qualified white students. In fact admission standards should be totally race and gender blind. Excellence should always take priority over diversity. Affirmative action should be removed from higher educational admission policies altogether. However, liberals appear to control the agenda with respect to affirmative action.In May of 00 the University of Michigan was sued by a group of white applicants who were denied admission to the University's graduate school because they were white. The main focus behind this lawsuit was whether affirmative action should take place in college admission policies. The facts disclosed that less qualified applicants of diverse minorities with lower test scores were admitted at the expense of better-qualified white applicants. The University of Michigan did not deny the plaintiff's claim and argued that diversity is an essential element of current American society. Over 50 public corporations including Microsoft, Intel, General Motors, Exxon, and Texaco supported the University of Michigan's position by filing "friend of the court" briefs claiming corporations need a more culturally diverse work force to meet the needs of their multi-cultural clientele ( Hawkins). David Wilkins, director of global diversity at Dow Chemical Company claimed, the reason Dow and other companies support University of Michigan is because it is right, good and beneficial for the educational environment" (Parker). In another quote our customer base is extremely diverse and it is important that our workforce represent the diversity of our customers, claims Randall Mehrberg, the executive vice president for Exxon Corp" (Becker). These corporations have little motive to support the University of Michigan's affirmative action policy other than attempting to gain social status among the minorities and liberals. Bill Gates, president of Microsoft, is a believer in affirmative action in higher education systems. In 1 Gates began a twenty-year billion-dollar scholarship fund program. However he openly said that all white students are void from these scholarships (Williams 1). It is an appalling and racist act, when one of the worlds wealthiest men feels a need to intentionally discriminate against disadvantaged white children. The message Gates put out says either there are no deserving underprivileged white students in the country or that race is the most important standard for determining charity. This clearly is reverse discrimination in action. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the University of Michigan by a six to three vote, however the University can no longer use its current admissions point system or a quota system. This quota system that the University of Michigan and many other universities used was based on a 150-point scale. Minorities were awarded an automatic 0 extra points towards the 150 just for applying. (Zeman 4). The most absurd part is that a perfect SAT and ACT score is only worth twelve points each. Therefore a genius, with a perfect score on their SAT and ACT receives 4 points while a minority student scoring a twelve on the ACT and a 0 on the SAT is awarded points. A racial quota like this should not exist anywhere in today's modern society particularly in higher education. In a public response to this issue, President George Bush said "students who accumulate 100 points are generally admitted, so those 0 points awarded solely based on race are often the decisive factor "(Bush 1). "Bush called the University of Michigans race-based admissions policies unfair, and said he was intervening in the Supreme Court case examining their constitutionality"(Flores). The United States Supreme Court basically ruled against university quotas per se, however the court manufactured a new theory of law establishing a concept of protected diversity. Realizing how corrupt affirmative action can be, the Texas Circuit Court of Appeals banned state universities from the ability to use affirmative action in their admission process in 16. With the U.S. Supreme Court being the supreme law of the land according to the U.S. Constitution, the University of Michigan court ruling unfortunately put the Texas court ruling to an end. The University of Michigan filed by the white applicants against racial quotas actually made it possible for Texas universities to once again use affirmative action in its admission process. A liberal school like the University of Texas did not hesitate at such an opportunity as they already began adding affirmative action to their admission policy (Affirmative 1).During the U.S. Supreme Court's deliberation on the University of Michigan case, the top ten percent rule in the State of Texas was notably discussed. President George Bush had an interest in the top ten percent rule because he signed the rule into law while Governor of Texas. President Bush argued that his affirmative access program is not a racial quota. The rule allows the admission of the top ten percent of each high school's students to Texas universities. The President claimed this rule is a better alternative than racial quotas or affirmative action. Regardless of the size of their high school any student whose grade point average ranks in the schools top ten percent are qualified for acceptance. Parenthetically, the discussion in the University of Michigan case was whether the top ten percent rule in Texas is considered a quota. In a large well-educated high school with hundreds if not thousands of students per class, the top ten percent rule may work well. However, a class of 15 to 150 students in a much poorly educated district the law is not fair. A likely ten percent drop off point for the large high school is a .8 grade point average while it is close to a .0 in the smaller less educated school. This is a clear disadvantage for the students in the larger school. A less educated student with a 15 on his act but a .0 in his small high school will be automatically accepted to a University whose ACT requirement is 4. It's much harder to argue this point for a student in a well-educated school with a .8 grade point average. President Bush argues that the Texas top ten percent rule provides for diversity. The reason the President feels that way is very simple because the ten percent rule is colorblind. This gets to the essence of diversity verses excellence, allowing excellence to prevail. Foreign and minority students applying for admission to any American university has a very good chance of acceptance. Many of these foreign and minority students are well qualified and deserve to be admitted. Nevertheless the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in the University of Michigan case changes the entire playing field. By establishing the new legal principle of law saying diversity should be protected, this means that diversity takes precedent over excellence. In other words, the U.S. Supreme Court specifically said we are going to promote, advance, and protect diversity because many people in America feel that diversity is the best interest in our nation. While there may not be anything wrong with promoting diversity per se, when diversity is promoted at the expense of excellence in simply cannot be considered to be in the best interest in the United States of America. Excellence should be promoted not discouraged. In our politically correct society it appears that large universities that promote diversity appear to receive more respect from the media, the academic and liberal segments of our society. This is to be expected because these same entities are on the front battle lines of nearly every social change being advocated from abortion, homosexuality, and secular society. Today, colleges with large diversities appear to receive more respect throughout the nation for giving "others" the opportunity to succeed. Nationality, race, gender, and religion should be irrelevant. Just as no one should be discriminated against neither should anyone receive a special benefit such as a quota because of their race, gender, or religion. Acceptance and advancement in life should be primarily based on performance, qualification, and ability. Therefore ACT scores, SAT scores, high school grades, transferred college grades, and their extra curricular activities should be the only consideration granted. It is inaccurate and unfair for a university to be labeled racist or prejudiced if their students turn out to be primarily white. Universities claiming above ninety percent non-white students such as Grambling State, Hampton University and others never hear complaints about their "need" to diversify. These schools do not have many white students and yet they are not targets of the "diversity at any cost" Klan. These schools are considered historical and no one challenges their diversity or lack there of. An Internet or newspaper search relating to black colleges comes up with an advertisement of all so-called "diverse" schools such as Grambling State and Hampton University. However when using the same search procedure for white colleges emphasis is placed on the need for white colleges to diversify and much is made about minority struggles at primarily white schools. Most predominately white schools will not claim to educate only white students and will welcome qualified foreign and minority students. However most black colleges claim that pure African American education and campus life is their goal. Today it is acceptable to have Black Entertainment Television, black magazines, black sororities and fraternities, and black schools, but anything labeled white-only is considered prejudice. Bill Thomas, Hampton Universitys director of governmental relations, talked about the Michigan lawsuit saying Hampton University will… bring people home when theyre not welcome elsewhere. Black people need to come home. Weve got to do for ourselves. This comment proves how conflicted affirmative action followers can be (Gaona 1).Who is right when it comes to universities using affirmative action for admission? Easy question. The white students who challenged the University of Michigan's admissions quotas are right. These students clearly had the better qualifications to be accepted over the minority students. Nevertheless the better-qualified white applicants were denied admission. Our nation will never put race "behind us" and make it a thing of the past if actions like this and affirmative action exist. Justice Thomas, a black U.S. Supreme Court judge, was against the Supreme Court's ruling in the University of Michigan's case. "Thomas called affirmative action a cruel farce of racial discrimination and a faddish slogan of the [elite]. (Kelly ). Ruban Duran, a Hispanic student of the University of Michigan claimed, I would have wanted to see the University of Michigans policies knocked down. I would have liked to see an end to the use of racial preferences in college admissions. Period (Washington 1). Ward Connerly a black founder of the conservative American Civil Rights Institute said "it is about ending preferences on the basis of race…affirmative action hurts minorities by presuming they are inadequate" (Shine 1). These quotes prove that members of various minorities also see the fallacy of affirmative action and believe that it will lead to greater racial mistrust.The battle between diversity and excellence is in its infancy. Just as infants grow up and change throughout their lives, the conflict between diversity and excellence will also develop. We attempt to teach our infants to do their best at everything they do. Likewise we should teach our infants not to find excuses to justify their lack of success. Just as everyone should have the right to rise to the level of their competency, regardless of their race (even whites), everyone should also have the right and the probability that they will rise to the level of their incompetence.
Please note that this sample paper on Affirmative Action is Higher Education is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Affirmative Action is Higher Education, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Affirmative Action is Higher Education will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
